Nothing in life spontaneously occurs. Every action, idea, thing, or animal can find its roots in something else. Evolution shows us that our environments naturally select the best traits to survive. Though the concept of Natural Selection can be very complex, it is also a very logical way to look at all aspects of life to understand the origin of anything. The intent of this is mere entertainment, hopefully showing some anomalies and curious events of the world.
Evolution
Friday, March 22, 2013
Is reviving an extinct species a good idea?
I don't know, but reviving this movie is a good idea!
Saturday, February 9, 2013
I'll Be Back!
A bit fitting.
"Terminator 2 follows Sarah Connor (Hamilton) and her son John (Furlong) as they are pursued by a new, more advanced Terminator" (wiki)
More advanced. Sounds like some evolution in the mix. And on that logic, naturally, I solute the Governator.
"As man can produce and certainly has produced a great result by his methodical and unconscious means of selection, what may not Nature effect? Man can act only on external and visible characters: Nature cares nothing for appearances, except in so far as they may be useful to any being. She can act on every internal organ, on every shade of constitutional difference, on the whole machinery of life. Man selects only for his own good; Nature only for that of the being which she tends. Every selected character is fully exercised by her; and the being is placed under well-suited conditions of life." --Darwin
It is true that men act under unconscious means of selection, and apparently women try to exploit that... (maybe some more than others)
From an evolutionary standpoint it just makes sense.
I saw this article and I couldn't help but think of Karl Pilkington... again. It has now inspired me to create a reoccurring segment to this blog... "Do we want em?" Yes, it is a direct rip off from the Ricky Gervais Show with a little bit of a tweak to it. The difference is that I do not feel that "need" is a good question because I would have no idea how to answer that. See, even ideas evolve. Here's the article if you want to read it....
Here is also a small segment of Karl's "Do we need em?"
I think it is pretty obvious that if mosquitoes did not exist, evolution would take its course and predators would readjust their diets and the prey would just be eaten/fed on by something else. I see no good in having a mosquito around: They spread disease; they're annoying; according to the article, they are not crucial for crops useful to humans; there is no use for mosquitoes in human life. The only interaction I have had with a mosquito is to try and kill it or repel it with bug spray. Take a look at the links other have gone too...
I won't be going this far.
In short, I do not want them around; however, I do fear that something worse may take its place. The article did bring up an interesting point, that as we inadvertently drive beneficial species to the brink of extinction, such as tuna, we will never be the cause for the eradication of the mosquito. So, do we want em? (Take a vote in the side bar).
Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages. --Thomas Edison
Venus World: Created and performed by the Earwigs (Matt Mankowski, Michael Lang, Spencer Murphy)